Quality & Independence

ObjectiveTechnical RigorDue Diligence
Garner ForensicsFORENSIC ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION & EXPERT SUPPORT

QUALITY & INDEPENDENCE

Objective Engineering Judgment. Technical Rigor. Professional Accountability.

Garner Forensics exists to provide objective, independent, and technically rigorous forensic engineering services in support of insurance claims, legal matters, and dispute resolution.

The quality system is built around independence, ethics, due diligence, documented limitations, and defensible technical conclusions.

Quality Principles

Independence and Neutrality

Engineering judgment should remain free from bias, financial influence, outcome-driven pressure, or advocacy.

Public Protection and Ethics

Professional engineering obligations include public protection, ethical conduct, and responsibility to all parties affected by the investigation.

Technical Authority

Technical conclusions rest with the assigned Principal Investigator, who is accountable for the integrity and defensibility of the work.

Due Diligence

Investigations are conducted to the extent reasonably necessary within authorized scope. Assumptions, limitations, and uncertainties are documented.

Professional Conduct

Reports and communications are factual, neutral in tone, respectful, and free from advocacy or demeaning language.

Continuous Improvement

Processes are improved through review, lessons learned, corrective action, and quality-system discipline.

How Quality Shows Up in the Work

Quality is not just a policy statement. It affects intake, scope control, evidence review, analysis, reporting, communication, and follow-up authorization.

Professional Boundary

Garner Forensics provides engineering review and technical support, not legal advice, insurance coverage determinations, claim-adjusting decisions, or unscoped opinions.

Controlled Review Practices

Scope Definition

Work begins only after conflict review, written acceptance, and authorization of scope.

Documented Limitations

Missing records, site restrictions, evidence changes, assumptions, and uncertainty are identified where relevant.

Defensible Findings

Findings should be traceable to evidence, observations, engineering principles, and professional judgment.

Ready to submit an assignment?

Submit basic assignment information and known deadlines for scope and assignment review. Supporting documents may be requested later through controlled transfer when appropriate.